More Pages: Eagle Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70


Good ideas, poor execution
Excellent historic fiction by a writer to watch for.Simon Scarrow does a wonderful job bringing history to life through the exploits of new recruit and optio Quintus Licinius Cato--and his centurion, Lucius Cornelius Macro. These two fictional characters weave a credible story by their interaction with fictionalized versions of Vitellius, Vespasian and his wife Flavia, and Narcissus--freedman, secretary and confidant of the Emperor Claudius.
I look forward to reading further novels by this author as they make their way into American publication, and highly recommend this work of fiction for anyone with interest in this part of history. You might also enjoy the "Roma Sub Rosa" series by Steven Saylor and the "SPQR" series by John Maddox Roberts.
A thoroughly enjoyable read, fascinating start to finish!

the eagles gift - how to dream your way to freedom.
Amen to that...
The Eagle's gift: the ultimate man's challenge

Is it over already?This is actually two books in one. Half of it takes place in Tobyn Ser revolving around Jaryd and the other half in Lon Ser revolving around Meylor. I found it very amazing how Coe seemed to change the characters (there is a ten year period between the happenings in the first book and the third) while keeping them the same. Coe's ability to tell a story is one of the best. You will not get bored or recieve any filler all the while being on they edge of your seat. I had trouble putting this book down and though it is not so in depth as many other fantasy series, it is fun if nothing else. Definately read this series.
Read this book.
an excellent fantasy author

Anna whines a lot, but who can blame her?
Still Her BestFor those of us who have ever felt the despair of knowing that love alone cannot save a marriage; for those of us who have been drawn into a loved-one's depression and cannot break free; and for any mother alive who has had a hurting, unpopular child--this book describes feelings that are impossible to put into words.
Anna Bouverie (yes, I see the parallel to Madame Bovary, but Anna has more soul) is the wife of a village rector. Her life is rigidly circumscribed by the expectations of her husband's parisioners. Thus, it is important that she head certain "rotas" (I love that word; British for "rotations," meaning committee members who take turns doing church chores). It is imperative that she appear impeccable in her clothing, her behavior, her mothering, and just about everything else. This is not easy, as her stolid, dogmatic husband Peter makes such a paltry living that their children have to wear parishioners' second-hand giveaways. In fact, the Bouveries are living in a kind of static hell, although nobody but poor, miserable schoolgirl Flora seems to realize it, and her perceptions are all about being a misfit in her horrid school.
Peter and Anna are sustained by a bright vision of the future: Peter hopes to be named archdeacon, which will change their circumstances considerably. The bitter loss of this hope is the catalyst that eventually destroys Peter--and sets Anna free.
As Peter sinks inexorably into a deep, surly depression, Anna's attempts to reach him, to connect as they did when their marriage was young, are angrily rebuffed. On her own, metaphorically at least, Anna, desperate to remove Flora from the hated school and place her in another where she can thrive, takes a practical step. She gets a job stacking shelves in a supermarket, so she can earn enough money to pay for the new school.
The outraged gossip from a secretly delighted parish (not only is the rector's wife working; but she is placing their child in a Catholic school! Horrors!) Peter's icy, enraged reaction, and Anna's rebirth as a woman form the crux of the rest of the story. Events simply evolve, unstoppable and unpreventable, even as they race to their (...)conclusion.
I love this book. I love the truth of it. I love Trollope's eye for rural British life; I love her characterizations; I love her understated and measured style of writing. If you only read one Joanna Trollope book, make this the one.
I absolutely love this book!

Read this book and you will get killed!
Excellent book by an excellent teacherThe reviewer who keeps writing the same bad review over and over again obviously knows absolutely nothing about kung fu. He doesn't realize that the techniques in this book are the beginners training techniques of a complex kung fu system, not simple self-defense moves. This reviewer says "the locks are too complicated to use in a real fight". Some of the techniques are complicated, and they require lots of practice. But after they are mastered they can be executed in a split second by a skilled martial artist. This what separates martial arts from self defense; self defense is simple and easy to use, while martial arts are very complex and take many years to master. Marial arts can only be learnt directly from a master, people who think they can read a book and suddenly be able to use the techniques in fighting do not understand martial arts.
The reviewer also says that kung fu is only for looks. It is understandable that someone would say this because the movements in kung fu are often very unsusual, and look as though they have no value as a fighting technique. This is part of the mystery of kung fu, in reality every movement is a powerful fighting technique.
The book is well made and the pictures are of high quality. A person cannot learn kung fu from books, but this book is very good for getting familiar with authentic Eagle Claw, studying the comlicated techniques of this style, and learning the basic priciples of this style. The book also includes the 108 locking techniques of Eagle Claw, which have previously been kept secret for many years. I would recommend this book highly to anyone interested in learning about this style. It is rare that such a distinguished master such as Leung Shum writes a book, most books written on the subject of kung fu are written by unqualified masters.
A real GrandMaster writing for real students

Commercialism
New Age Native American stuffWhat Medicine Eagle is trying to do here is present her experiences and conclusions about the nature of reality and the spirit world. These conclusions are often tentative and one often gets a feeling that her work is still very much in progress. In any case, one can be virtually certain that anyone who writes books about Native American spirituality is either a sincere beginner (who still harbors the illusion that talking about it can be useful) or a shameless exploiter of naive audiences, or both. This book belongs somewhere in between naivete and exploitation. The first part, which deals with her vision quests, is interesting. The second part is a plug for her workshops and is boring.
One chapter I liked was the one on Moshe Feldenkreis. The Westerner tends to be disconnected from his/her body and any spiritual work done under such circumstances can be fruitless or positively dangereous (spirits talk to us through the body and if we are not conscious of the talk, they will tweak the subconscious mind in ways we might not appreciate). Feldenkreis was a true expert in bodymind integration and a combination of his teachings with those of indigenous traditions is a great thing.
Creator has created all of us equal and what (s)he cares about is not the tribe one might belong to but the sincerity of our prayers and a dedication to "save all beings" because all of them are our relations. Spirit has many ways of seeping into our body and expanding our awareness of interconnectedness. Brooke, in this book, shows us her own path towards such awareness. It seems to work for her and maybe it will work for others, too.
A GREAT BOOK!

On the bandwagonKen, you're supposed to lose self importance not inflate your ego even more.
Great book, but annoying tooHe claims to have met "Don Juan". I won't comment there, perhaps it was a vision, perhaps Castaneda only had a vision. Perhaps Don Juan met a lot of people (I've met a lot of people, why shouldn't he?). The quality of the work stands above and beyond such things.
However, one thing that was a major turn off was that the author changed a lot of the Castaneda terminology so it would be "politically correct". Personally, I think that the term "ranger" sounds pretty dumb. The terms "warrior" and "stalking" reflect and suggest the strong link to death that runs very strong in the Toltec world. Are we really only "tracking" power? Do we just want to see were it has been so a real "stalker" can capture it for us because we're a bit to PC for the job? :P
Why "pretty it up"? This annoying feature couples with what I found to be a bit too much of a "joy joy" New Age and PC perspective. I suppose the author isn't just redoing Castaneda, and offers his own perspective. Frankly, this addition isn't appreciated. What I loved so much about Castaneda was the "no bs" grit of the perspectives offered there. Castaneda kept it real and this author does harm in my opinion by bending the system like he does. I'd rather have seen him simply offer his own view of the Toltec universe without the references to Don Juan or Castaneda and thereby sully them by association. Either you have the ethos to do it on your own or you ought to submit something more in the spirit of those whom you want to represent.
Oh well, otherwise, it's a comprehensive introduction to the world of the Toltec "sorcerers" found in Castaneda's books (my apologies for saying a bad word).
5 stars for a comprehensive and readable job, 1 star for the patronizing PC goop that pervades this book. I'm weighting the content, and simply plugged my nose when I had to, so 4 stars.
This is one of the best Toltec books available now.I give this book 5 stars, well-deserved.


Interesting reading. But keep in mind what your reading.
It takes Courage
Another wonderful encounter with Rosemary Altea

Very disappointingYes, I admit, a majority of the books I read are true romances so therefore I'm a bit predjudiced when I say I didn't like this book. Romance is not the main theme here. It is the struggle for Native Americans to receive recognition.
The chemistry between Heather and Kole (who the author can't decide whether to call Kole or Kola) is tepid. They fall in bed almost immediately and everything else is anticlimatic (sorry for the pun). He's got issues with his past, is on the run for a prison break and unfortunately Ms. Eagle gives him the type of dialog that puts you to sleep.
Thank goodness I just got this from the library. I'd hate to think I wasted money purchasing this book.
Kole and Heather make magicKole and Heather have a lot of road blocks in the way of their love. That's what makes a page turner. I sat up way past midnight reading this one in a single sitting. Kole doesn't seem attractive as a hero at first. He can even seem threatening to Heather, but when she needs him, he's there and the ending is beautiful, perfect. I loved every word!
This is one of my favorites

thought provoking but flawedLong clearly has an agenda here, which is to highlight the flaws in the heroes and motivations of the so-called Texas Revolution (which Long claims was more of a hostile takeover - given the United States' expansionist mindset at the time, he's probably right), and to show that there were other points of view. He does this in an extremely thought-provoking manner, writing the book like a suspense novel. It made me call into question all the blind faith I, and probably most Texans, had in the heroes of the Alamo.
However, there are some serious flaws here. In pursuit of his agenda he makes some assertions without backing them up with facts. And his portrayal of David Crockett betrays an obviously personal bias. He starts out depicting him as a consumate politician who went to Texas hoping to rebuild his political reputation - OK, fair enough, that's probably true. However, his depiction of Crockett's death - on his knees, begging for his life - has no basis in fact. No eyewitness accounts from the period mention this. Admittedly, those accounts are all Mexican, and they may have been biased, since by the time they gave them Mexico had been defeated, and it doesn't pay to brag that one of your conqueror's heroes died a coward, but there's no evidence about his death either way. Scholars are pretty sure he was executed, not killed in battle as depicted in numerous, overblown paintings, but beyond that we don't know. So where does Long get his story?
I don't know what kind of research Long did for this book, so I can't back up any of his claims. However, this book's mere existence at least calls into question all the pro-Texas, pro-American, pro-white mythology that surrounds the Alamo, which can only spark debate and more research into history, and that's a good thing.
P.S. If Long is so biased towards the Mexican side of the conflict, why does he portray Santa Anna as damn near psychotic?
Excellent Account of the AlamoThe book is also the most objective, in that it does not start with the premise that the Texans were right and the Mexicans wrong. It provides a wealth of information on the political and historical background of the battle, enabling the reader to understand the battle in the context of the larger struggle between the United States and Mexico. Unlike many other accounts, Long's emphasizes that Texas was a part of Mexico; the Texas Revolution was not so much about liberty-loving Texans fighting against a despotic Mexican dictatorship as it was about Americans having migrated to Texas and still feeling primarily loyal to the U.S. rather than Mexico. The reasons for the colonists' loyalty to the U.S. were not always noble--for example, many of them wanted to own slaves, which was allowed in the U.S. but not in Mexico. Long's book is also superior because it provides so much detail. All other books on the Alamo seem superficial by comparison.
As good as this book is, it also has some major flaws. It is written in a somewhat academic, laborious style, so it is not as captivating as accounts written in a more popular style, such as Lon Tinkle's 13 Days to Glory and Walter Lord's A Time to Stand. Also, Long takes a pretty cynical perspective, painting almost everyone, American and Mexican alike, in pretty negative terms. And he seems to prefer melodramatic explanations at the expense of more reasonable, but also more prosaic, ones. That said, this is the closest yet written to being the definitive account of the Alamo.
A brilliant and much needed reassessment.Imagine my surprise and pleasure, then, when browsing in an Austin Texas bookshop to find that this self-same writer of mountain lore was also the author of a couple of books on Texas history. The first, "Duel of Eagles" was written in 1990. The second, "Empire of Bones", was written as a follow up and covers the events leading up to the massacre that was the Battle of San Jacinto.
"Duel of Eagles" concerns itself with the Mexican-American fight for the Alamo in particular, but also Texas, more generally. It will not be on the recommended reading list of those who treasure the largely fictional accounts of "historical giants" as David Crockett, Sam Houston or William Travis.
It exposes an uncomfortable fact from the history of the United States. And that is that Texas was by and large stolen from Mexico. And it was stolen by a rag tag band of slavers, gun runners and petty criminals (many of whom acted with shocking depravity and cruelty) operating with the open encouragement of the American government. Say what you will about Mexico of the day, it had a constitution, it had a duly constituted government and it was a sovereign power. That didn't stop Andrew Jackson.
But in case you think this is a piece of pro-Mexican propaganda, guess again. Long is as harsh in his treatment of the Mexicans as he is of the Americans. The point here being that he is not afraid to tell the unvarnished truth. For too long Americans, and the rest of the world, have laboured under the impression that the Mexicans were the aggressors. They were not. But just because they were responding to a hostile attempt to steal a huge chunk of their land, does not mean they were any better than the people who were trying to steal their land from them (though the Mexicans had, at that point, abolished slavery - this was one of the grievances that the pro-slavery Texans harboured against the Mexican government).
Long's book is incisively written. He went straight to the primary sources -- journals, letters, articles, government documents and newsletters. The story that emerges is not pretty and is not flattering to the American government or people of the day.
For almost the first time Long tells the Mexican side of the story. For those of you familiar with the movie version of the Battle for the Alamo, it may come as a shock to know that the battle was over within 45 minutes. That Santa Anna brushed aside the token and futile resistance of the militia inside. That far from the glorious and prolonged last stand depicted in the movies, it was a short, sharp and nasty melee. Virtually no Mexican soldiers died at the hands of the Americans. Hardly the American Rorke's Drift.
It is passingly strange that two of the most prominent incidents in American History that are cited for their heroic qualities are in fact largely devoid of any of the heroism with which they have been imbued by succeeding generations of hagiographers anxious to burnish the reputations of men who were in the best light charlatans and boors. These two incidents are the Alamo and the Last Stand at Little Big Horn. This is not to say that the soldiers who fought and died in those struggles did not exhibit great personal courage. What I do mean to say is that they fought for causes that were tinged if not polluted by course and venal motives.
This book is a page turner. It is a necessary anti-dote to the propaganda that disguises itself as the history of the founding of the State of Texas.
The storyline is good and the concept of a fictional account of the roman invasion of Britain is great. But the writing and story-telling are too poor to carry it off. The author advances the plot with coincidence and gross improbabilities. For example, the prologue opens with an iron-bound wooden chest being dumped into the waters of a bog. 100 years and 200 pages later characters looking for the chest just happen to literally fall upon it during their search and of course it is perfectly intact.
The characters are flat and their interactions clunky. Characters use jarringly modern, anglicized slang. For example, the favored curse is "bloody", and Germanic tribes (he calls the tribes Germans) are referred to as "Hermans".
Characters might shout "Up and at 'em!" to start an infantry charge or shout "On your feet, ladies!". Any author trying to capture ancient conversation styles is in a real fix but Scarrow's decision to use lines reminiscent of WW-2 B-movies is unfortunate for the reader.
Save your time and $$$ for some other book. A second star only because I could finish it.